Buddhism 103: Riding the Bike Behind the Waterfall

I certainly don't mean to suggest that I am enlightened in any way. I honestly don't think I know or have experienced enough to be qualified to determine if I am enlightened or not or to what degree I may be down the path, and given that fact, any consideration that I may be enlightened seems much closer to arrogance than to acknowledgment of truth. But the truth is I don't particularly care, and I think that is also kind of the point. To seek enlightenment is a desire itself. Enlightenment is not the goal; presence is the goal. Enlightenment is just the label we have applied to the experience of nothingness, no different than "rising"-"falling", "in"-"out", "lifting"-"placing"-"stepping". What I do know is that I am fundamentally different than I was six months ago, even three months ago, and different in an irreversible way. Living behind the waterfall is an appropriate analogy, but I resonate more with my analogy for getting to be behind the waterfall: riding the bike.

Anyone who has ever learned how to ride a bicycle remembers the experience of the moment in which it clicked, the moment when the hurdle of the required sense of balance was overcome and the balance became entrenched in one's consciousness in a way that could be recalled again and again anytime they wanted to ride. Short of physical brain trauma, you can't unlearn how to ride a bike. Your consciousness is fundamentally changed with the new experience. And that is the sentiment I relate to. I feel like I am riding a bike. I see my own consciousness in a way that I did not before, that is now as obvious to me as the nose on my face, or perhaps more appropriately as my own breathing. For me, there is no "asshole voice", as Dan Harris would put it; no personal Satan, as I have called it in the past. There is only the nature of consciousness, and an imperfect process called evolution developed consciousness to be the imperfect experience we perceive every day. Sometimes it creates scenarios that are just debilitating, but now that I can see and sense and feel - and yes, sometimes it is so vivid that it is almost feeling on a physical level - the process by which my consciousness just does its thing and creates something seductively misrepresentative of reality, I can simply non-attach from it or block the attachment in the first place. Sometimes riding a bike is smooth, sometimes it is choppy, some rides require a lot more balance than other rides. I have balance now. There is no malicious intent nor fault (hence, no asshole or Satan); it just is. Behind the waterfall is a place or state of being in relation to our thoughts; riding the bike is how we get from the waterfall to behind it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forced birth is slavery

The Supreme Court of the United States appears to be on the precipice of making the most heinous, inhuman ruling of law since the Dred Scott case. There is no way to sugarcoat the gravity of the stakes. Restricting abortion rights denies a person of their humanity. Fundamental to issue of abortion rights is the concept of bodily autonomy. If a person does not have the right to dominion over their own body, which certainly must be denied in order to deny a pregnant person the right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy, then truly, a person does not have any other rights at all. Without the self-evident right to bodily autonomy, a citizen of the United States loses all of the following rights which have been sacrosanct since before the Constitution was drafted, before the Declaration of Independence was signed: Freedom of speech Without control over their own body, a person does not have the right to articulate, write or type words. If the state has control over a person's body, the s
Read more

The Right to Bear Arms is Outdated and Needs to be Repealed from the Constitution

The 2nd Amendment grants citizens the right to use a certain technology. It does not say "right to defend themselves" or "right to carry swords". It says "right to bear arms". The historically and contextually accurate interpretation of the 2nd Amendment is the states have the right to defend themselves against an aggressive federal government by using war technology which was, at the time of the drafting of the Bill of Rights, guns: manual rifles and hand pistols which could fire 1-2 bullets per minute. If the intent was enable states to defend themselves, then clearly they must have the right to match the war technology of the aggressive federal government against whom they have the right to defend themselves. The concept that the right is limited to guns is historically-bound and irrational, as it does not advanced through time along with literally every other right and law in the Federal Code. If the aggressive federal government uses technology to adv
Read more

Joshua stopping the sun

I would argue that a spherical earth is in fact anti-(Abrahamic religions). There are several passages of "historical events" in the Old Testament that cannot possibly be true unless the Earth is flat and stationary. For example, Joshua stopping the sun in the sky for 12 hours and then starting it again. If Joshua had stopped the rotation of the spherical Earth, every object above ground, including the oceans, would have lurched forward at >1,000 mph, not merely killing almost all life on the planet but turning it to jelly. The story only works if the lightbulb is "out there" and we/Joshua are the ones who are stationary. Technically, yes he could have bent the light waves from the sun, but since the sun simply continued on afterward, that bending must still be in place today. The new curvature through space-time must have accounted for not only the sun but for literally every single light particle in the entire observable universe, because we are not physically
Read more